Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Commentary for Avodah Zarah 79:3

אמר רב יהודה משמיה דעולא מחלוקת לטבל בצירן אבל בגופן דברי הכל אסור עד שיהא ראש ושדרה ניכר אמר ר' זירא מריש הוה מטבילנא בצירן כיון דשמענא להא דאמר רב יהודה משמיה דעולא מחלוקת לטבל בצירן אבל בגופן דברי הכל אסור עד שיהא ראש ושדרה ניכר בצירן נמי לא מטבילנא

Rav Judah said in the name of Ulla: There is a dispute [between R. Huna and R. Nahman over the permissibility] to dip [bread] in the brine, but as regards eating the fish itself, all agree that it is prohibited unless both the head and backbone are recognizable. R. Zera said: At first I used to dip [bread] in the brine; but when I heard the statement of Rav Judah in the name of Ulla, “the dispute is over the permissibility to dip [bread] in the brine but as regards eating the fish itself all agree that it is prohibited unless both the head and backbone are recognizable,” I would not also dip in it.

Daf Shevui to Avodah Zarah

The rules regarding the brine are more lenient than the rules regarding eating the fish itself. To eat the fish itself, one needs to be able to see the head and backbone.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Daf Shevui to Avodah Zarah

R. Zera seems to hold like R. Huna, according to whom the head and backbone must be recognizable. But he used to think that the disagreement was over eating the fish itself. R. Huna would have agreed that when it comes to dipping in the brine, only one sign of its kashrut is needed. But then when he heard that they disagree over dipping in the brine, and that R. Huna said that even then both signs are needed, he stopped dipping in the brine.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse